Start
| Brief History |
The Roulette Table | How
It Works | Standard
Bets | Special Bets
| Progressions |
The D'Alembert System | The
Martingale System | more sections to come...
the D'Alembert System
The D'Alembert System
| The Contra D'Alembert System | The
Reduced D'Alembert System | Hands On the
table
The
D'Alembert System
The D'Alembert System is the most
famous progression born around the middle of 1700 and invented by
one of the major mathematician and philosopher of the French Enlightenment.
The D'Alembert is also known as "The Pyramid", because
of the shape of its fluctuating wagering structure.
General Concept
It was designed for use on simple
chances bets (Red/Black, Impair/Pair, Manque/Passe), where you alternate
with two events but can be used on any even chance bet.
The scope for this progression is to reach a balance between two
chances.
In other words, D'Alembert works under the assumption that over
a period of time there will be an equal number of "Reds"
and "Blacks".
Once you've reached the balance, you will register half unit winning
for every bet (or one unit for every 2 bets).
Rule
Its pretty easy: increase
your bet one unit after every loss, and decrease one unit after
every win.
Follow these simple points:
1) fix the unit value (chip = $1, $5 or any other value)
2) start the session by placing one unit on one of the even chance
bets (e.g. "Black")
3) after a losing bet you increase the next bet by one unit.
4) after a winning bet you decrease the next bet by one unit.
5) when you win by placing one unit, on the next spin you have to
bet one unit again.
6) stop bets when a balance between two chances is reached (equal
number of "reds" and "blacks").
7) start a new betting session from point 1).
Pratical
examples
Let's follow this first example:
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Black |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
RED |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
2 |
RED |
2 |
-2 |
-3 |
3 |
BLACK |
3 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
RED |
2 |
-2 |
-2 |
5 |
RED |
3 |
-3 |
-5 |
6 |
BLACK |
4 |
4 |
-1 |
7 |
BLACK |
3 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
BLACK |
2 |
2 |
4 |
- Spin #1
place 1 unit on Black,
Red outcomes, you lose
the result of this spin is -1 unit
bankroll after the spin is -1 unit
- Spin #2
increase your bet one unit: place 2 units on Black
Red outcomes again, you lose
the result of this spin is -2 units
bankroll after this spin is -3 units
- Spin #3
increase your bet one unit: place 3 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +3 units
bankroll after this spin is 0
- Spin #4
decrease your bet one unit: place 2 units on Black
Red outcomes, you lose
result of this spin is -2 units
bankroll after this spin is -2 units
- Spin #5
increase your bet one unit: place 3 units on Black
Red outcomes, you lose
result of this spin is -3 units
bankroll after this spin is -5 units
- Spin #6
increase your bet one unit: place 4 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +4 units
bankroll after this spin is -1 unit
- Spin #7
decrease your bet one unit: place 3 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +3 units
bankroll after this spin is +2
- Spin #8
decrease your bet one unit: place 2 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +2 units
bankroll after this spin is +4 units
The two chances after 8 bets have reached
the balance (4 "Reds" - 4 "Blacks"), the game
on the Black has produced 4 winning pieces/units (8 spins divided
by 2)
If we analyze three more hypothetical cases
based on 12 bets, where the balance is reached, you can notice that
the results are different.
You can see the examples referred to combination RED/BLACK supposed
betting always on RED.
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Red |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
2 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
4 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
-2 |
5 |
RED |
3 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
3 |
9 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
1 |
10 |
BLACK |
3 |
-3 |
-2 |
11 |
RED |
4 |
4 |
2 |
12 |
RED |
3 |
3 |
5 |
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Red |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
0 |
3 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
2 |
6 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
0 |
7 |
BLACK |
3 |
-3 |
-3 |
8 |
RED |
4 |
4 |
1 |
9 |
RED |
3 |
3 |
4 |
10 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
6 |
11 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
5 |
12 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
3 |
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Red |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
4 |
7 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
2 |
8 |
BLACK |
3 |
-3 |
-1 |
9 |
BLACK |
4 |
-4 |
-5 |
10 |
BLACK |
5 |
-5 |
-10 |
11 |
RED |
6 |
6 |
-4 |
12 |
BLACK |
5 |
-5 |
-9 |
In all three examples presented there is
a perfect balance as for the 12 spins taken into consideration you
win 6 times.
However while in the first two examples Red and Black are distributed
mainly in a normal way and the final result is positive, in the
third case we register a lost of nine units.
In order to close the game with a positive result you must search
for the balance not when the game starts but when the negative series
of Black begins.
So in this case you would need extra spins to win the gaming session.
In these examples the figure 0 will not be taken into consideration.
Normally, during low bet series, it will not affect the gaming session.
But, if the zero outcomes during high bets, it will cause disastrous
effects.
Conclusions
D'Alembert gives you two bonuses,
as first you do not increase your bets as rapidly which gives you
the chance to stop a session and accept a small to medium lost.
Secondly, you can find that your bankroll is positive before a session
is complete, this gives you the option to cut short a session with
a small win.
The downside is that a session can last for many spins, so you should
always give yourself time to run through a full session.
The main problem is the same as the other progressive systems: you
will win little and often but when you lose it will probably wipe
out all previous winnings and eat into your main bankroll.
As with all progressive systems you must
be very careful when you use them, the D'Alembert is not as dangerous
as the Martingale but it can still be the cause of very large losses.
The major negative aspect for the D'Alembert system is that you
will win only if the balance is been achieved starting from a series
of negative spins.
The D'Alembert system works correctly only when a balance has been
reached between winning and losing bets.
The classic D'Alembert progression is been
played with double chance (dozens and columns).
As the winning is for 2 pieces plus the bet, the game mechanism
is the following: augment the bet with one unit after two
bets lost and decrease by one unit after one winning bet.
There are numerous variations and many combinations but this one
is for sure the most famous.
The
Contra D'Alembert system
This system presents a variant in
comparison with the classic D'Alembert system and therefore all
previous considerations made are just the same.
The Contra D'Alembert system has been projected when it was clear
that the classic D'Alembert system required a great amount of money
and the balance return would be delayed later with hundreds of spins.
General
Concept
As the word says the Contra D'Alembert
system is exactly the opposite of the classic D'Alembert system
and it has been conceived to gain as much as possible during the
positive series (where as it doesn't occur in the classic D'Alembert).
In this case, the main purpose is to obtain profit on reaching the
balance between two chances.
Rule
Its pretty easy again: Increase
your bet by one unit after every win and decrease your bet by one
unit after every loss.
1) fix the unit value (chip = $1, $5 or any other value)
2) start the session by placing one unit on one of the even chance
bets (e.g. "Black")
3) after a losing bet you decrease the next bet by one unit
4) after a winning bet you increase the next bet by one unit
5) when you lose by placing one unit, on the next spin you have
to bet one unit again
6) stop bets when a balance between two chances is reached (equal
number of "reds" and "blacks")
7) start a new betting session from point 1)
Pratical
examples
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Black |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
RED |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
2 |
RED |
1 |
-1 |
-2 |
3 |
BLACK |
1 |
1 |
-1 |
4 |
RED |
2 |
-2 |
-3 |
5 |
RED |
1 |
-1 |
-4 |
6 |
BLACK |
1 |
1 |
-3 |
7 |
BLACK |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
8 |
BLACK |
3 |
3 |
2 |
- Spin #1
place 1 unit on Black
Red outcomes, you lose
the result of this spin is -1 unit
bankroll after the spin is -1 unit
- Spin #2
place 1 unit on Black again
Red outcomes again, you lose
the result of this spin is -1 unit
bankroll after this spin is -2 units
- Spin #3
place 1 unit on Black again
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +1 unit
bankroll after this spin is -1
- Spin #4
increase your bet one unit: place 2 units on Black
Red outcomes, you lose
result of this spin is -2 units
bankroll after this spin is -3 units
- Spin #5
decrease your bet one unit: place 1 unit on Black
Red outcomes, you lose
result of this spin is -1 unit
bankroll after this spin is -4 units
- Spin #6
place 1 unit on Black again
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +1 unit
bankroll after this spin is -3 unit
- Spin #7
increase your bet one unit: place 2 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +2 units
bankroll after this spin is -1
- Spin #8
increase your bet one unit: place 3 units on Black
Black outcomes, you win
result of this spin is +3 units
bankroll after this spin is 2 units
The two chances after 8 bets have reached
the balance (4 "Reds" - 4 "Blacks"), the game
on the Black has produced 2 winning units.
Once again in this case, when reaching the
balance (not considering the zero) it can produce a negative result,
see the following example:
Spin # |
Chance |
Bet on Red |
Result |
Bankroll |
1 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
BLACK |
3 |
-3 |
0 |
4 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
RED |
3 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
BLACK |
4 |
-4 |
1 |
7 |
BLACK |
3 |
-3 |
-2 |
8 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
-4 |
Conclusions
As this system offers reasonable protection
of the downside, it's one of the best to try (if you're determined
to play systems), because when losses come, your bets regress to
the base level, where they will stay until the winnings return.
This means there are few large winnings and more smaller losses
but also the winnings are likely to get fairly well wiped out with
one loss after a group of winnings.
It's not bad to exploit a winning run, if it is used as a sporadic
technique.
In fact, it has been known to employ betting schemes that are based
around this concept!
Reduced
D'Alembert
A variation that permits to optimize
the progressions.
We remind you the two principal faults present in the d'Alembert
progression:
1) In certain balance stages, when the first bets
are winning, on reaching the balance final result could be lost.
2) The balance could be reached after a certain
time prior considering it useful.
General
Concept
This version has been projected to
reduce the huge amount of wagered money you normally risk in the
classic D'Alembert system and permits to extend your gaming sessions
in a more confortable way.
This progression doesn't aim to reach the balance but mainly to
win a few units.
Rule
Increase your bet by one unit
for every five units loss and decrease by one unit for every five
units recovered.
Restart a new gaming session every time that session is a positive
bankroll even with only one unit.
Follow these simple points:
1) fix the unit value (chip = $1, $5 or any other value)
2) start the session by placing one unit on one of the even chance
bets (e.g. "Red")
3) Increase the bet by one unit every time the bankroll is negative
for 5 units
4) Decrease the bet by 1 unit every time 5 units are recovered
5) Every time the temporary bankroll is positive (accumulated result)
even with only one unit, start a new betting session from point
1)
Pratical
examples
See this example:
| Spin
# |
Chance |
Bet
on Red |
Result |
Accumulated
Result |
Bankroll |
| 1 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| 2 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| 3 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
|
| 4 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
| 5 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-1 |
|
| 6 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-2 |
|
| 7 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-3 |
|
| 8 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-4 |
|
| 9 |
RED |
1 |
1 |
-3 |
|
| 10 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-4 |
|
| 11 |
BLACK |
1 |
-1 |
-5 |
|
| 12 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
-3 |
|
| 13 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
|
| 14 |
BLACK |
2 |
-2 |
-3 |
|
| 15 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
-1 |
|
| 16 |
RED |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
In the first two spins there are two gaming
sessions both with one winning unit and therefore after two spins
the bankroll is +2.
The third gaming session is longer, exactly 14 spins, before it
can produce a positive accumulated result.
At the end of 16 spins the bankroll is +3 units.
Conclusions
As already stated, this system permits
to drastically reduce the risks but rely on a minor profit and therefore
you can play this system in a relaxed manner with a small amount
of money.
Hands
on the table
Now, you can test this progression
on Prestige's French Roulette for practice or for real money.
At the beginning and until you will not feel acquainted with the
system, we strongly advise you to try it during "For Practice"
session.
You could also download this
pdf file.
It contains a table suited to take notes of the spins result (coups),
bets and bankroll.
We suggest to print and use it for your gaming sessions.
In order
to save it on your computer right click on the link and select "Save
Target as..."
Good luck and have fun
Top of the page
|